Skip to content

WPB-17408 inconsistent database: unparseable emails #4578

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 10 commits into from
May 20, 2025
Merged

WPB-17408 inconsistent database: unparseable emails #4578

merged 10 commits into from
May 20, 2025

Conversation

jschaul
Copy link
Member

@jschaul jschaul commented May 14, 2025 •
edited
Loading

https://wearezeta.atlassian.net/browse/WPB-17408

This should help find instances of

 brig-index: cql-io: protocol error: parse error: response body reading
 From:    Reading column "email" of table "brig.user"

to analyze and then take further actions later.

Checklist

  • Add a new entry in an appropriate subdirectory of changelog.d
  • Read and follow the PR guidelines

@zebot zebot added the ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist label May 14, 2025
@jschaul jschaul marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2025 15:39
@jschaul jschaul requested review from a team as code owners May 14, 2025 15:39
@jschaul jschaul force-pushed the wpb-17408-unparseable-emails branch from 35d240e to b92d47d Compare May 20, 2025 10:32
@jschaul jschaul merged commit f8e4d87 into develop May 20, 2025
8 checks passed
@jschaul jschaul deleted the wpb-17408-unparseable-emails branch May 20, 2025 12:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@battermann battermann battermann approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ok-to-test Approved for running tests in CI, overrides not-ok-to-test if both labels exist
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jschaul @battermann @zebot