Re: jsonb array-style subscription

Dmitry Dolgov wrote:

> I've cleaned up the code, created a separate JsonbRef node (and there are a
> lot of small changes because of that), abandoned an idea of "deep nesting"
> of assignments (because it doesn't relate to jsonb subscription, is more
> about the
> "jsonb_set" function, and anyway it's not a good idea). It looks fine for
> me, and I need a little guidance - is it ok to propose this feature for
> commitfest 2016-03 for a review?

Has this patch been proposed in some commitfest previously? One of the
less-commonly-invoked rules of commitfests is that you can't add patches
that are too invasive to the last one -- so your last chance for 9.6 was
2016-01. This is harsh to patch submitters, but it helps keep the size
of the last commitfest down to a reasonable level; otherwise we are
never able to finish it.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services