| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL Audit Extension |
| Date: | 2016-02-01 19:32:10 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/31/16 8:07 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> David Steele wrote:
>> The attached patch implements audit logging for PostgreSQL as an
>> extension. I believe I have addressed the concerns that were raised at
>> the end of the 9.5 development cycle.
>
> This patch got no feedback at all during the commitfest. I think there
> is some interest on auditing capabilities so it's annoying and
> surprising that this has no movement at all.
Yes, especially since I've had queries at conferences, by email, and
once on this list asking if it would be submitted again. I would not
have taken the time to prepare it if I hadn't been getting positive
feedback.
> If the lack of activity means lack of interest, please can we all keep
> what we've been doing in this thread, which is to ignore it, so that we
> can just mark this as rejected.
If nobody comments or reviews then that would be the best course of action.
> I'm giving
> this patch some more time by moving it to next commitfest instead.
I was under the mistaken impression that the CF was two months long so I
appreciate getting more time.
Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2016-02-01 20:24:21 | pl/pgSQL, get diagnostics and big data |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2016-02-01 18:03:45 | Re: Re: PATCH: Split stats file per database WAS: autovacuum stress-testing our system |