| Lists: | pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers |
|---|
| From: | pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-16 22:14:25 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 02:18:32 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 5/16/17 18:14, pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
Was this change in naming pattern intentional?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 02:37:07 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 5/16/17 18:14, pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
>> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
> Was this change in naming pattern intentional?
Yes, it was. Andrew Dunstan suggested[1] during the
two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_"
after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names
would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches
(at least when using C locale). I believe his main concern was some logic
in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general.
When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ...
but I plan to be safely dead by then.
BTW, I now remember having wondered[2] if we should make any other changes
in version-number formatting while we're at it, like maybe "10beta1"
should be "10.beta1". It's a bit late to have remembered it for beta1,
but is anyone hot to change anything else about these labels?
regards, tom lane
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/[email protected]
[2] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20780.1463176901%40sss.pgh.pa.us
| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 12:04:04 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 05/16/2017 10:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 5/16/17 18:14, pgsql(at)postgresql(dot)org wrote:
>>> Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created.
>> Was this change in naming pattern intentional?
> Yes, it was. Andrew Dunstan suggested[1] during the
> two-part-version-number discussion that we should start including a "_"
> after REL in tag and branch names for v10 and later, so that those names
> would sort correctly compared to the tag/branch names for earlier branches
> (at least when using C locale). I believe his main concern was some logic
> in the buildfarm, but it seems like a good idea in general.
>
> When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ...
> but I plan to be safely dead by then.
>
Me too. Since posterity will be deprived of both of us let's note that
the same hack will work, we'll just need two underscores.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 12:41:42 |
| Message-ID: | [email protected] |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 5/16/17 22:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I now remember having wondered[2] if we should make any other changes
> in version-number formatting while we're at it, like maybe "10beta1"
> should be "10.beta1".
That's not a naming format I've ever seen.
I think the current format is fine.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 13:14:37 |
| Message-ID: | CABUevEx93UEOnUTzTbt-uoMF=WatwYHGycdo-+awaY5u7L8FLA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Peter Eisentraut <
peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 5/16/17 22:37, Tom Lane wrote:
> > BTW, I now remember having wondered[2] if we should make any other
> changes
> > in version-number formatting while we're at it, like maybe "10beta1"
> > should be "10.beta1".
>
> That's not a naming format I've ever seen.
>
> I think the current format is fine.
>
>
+1. I have also never seen that one, and think the current one is good.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: https://www.hagander.net/ <http://www.hagander.net/>
Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/ <http://www.redpill-linpro.com/>
| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Tag refs/tags/REL_10_BETA1 was created |
| Date: | 2017-05-17 16:24:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaUQ4CG94Qmt+fYATwD5A+KbP=i_8zNeB7Q2UTCt_y-rw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> When we get to v100, we'll need some other hack to make it work ...
>> but I plan to be safely dead by then.
>
> Me too. Since posterity will be deprived of both of us let's note that
> the same hack will work, we'll just need two underscores.
That cure sounds worse than the disease, but I guess we can leave the
decision to posterity.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company