EXTREMELY BUGGY WIKI EDITOR the editor is the most horrifying writer's nightmare. I once time used to create some article but whenever I try to edit and add something new, it gets f***ed up e.g. some... Mehr ansehen
Wir überprüfen keine spezifischen Behauptungen, da die Meinungen der Bewerter ihre eigenen sind. Wir können Bewertungen jedoch als „verifiziert” kennzeichnen, wenn wir bestätigen können, dass eine geschäftliche Interaktion stattgefunden hat. Mehr erfahren
Um die Integrität unseres Portals zu schützen, überprüft unsere automatisierte Software alle Bewertungen – unabhängig davon, ob sie verifiziert sind oder nicht – rund um die Uhr. Diese Technologie identifiziert und entfernt Inhalte, die gegen unsere Richtlinien verstoßen, wie zum Beispiel Bewertungen, die nicht auf einer wirklichen Erfahrungen basieren. Uns ist bewusst, dass wir möglicherweise nicht alles erfassen, doch Sie können uns jederzeit problematische Inhalte melden, die wir Ihrer Meinung nach übersehen haben. Mehr erfahren
Das sagen Bewerter
There are adds everywhere, they treat there users terribly, and It’s all around just a worse experience than competing sites like mirahes and wiki.gg. additionally they know how to work search engines... Mehr ansehen
Fandom (or Wikia, Wikicities) is THE best source with Wikipedia. I use this everyday for backrooms, etc. Well, continue the good updates! Good luck, Fandom. - Natolix
Fraudulent image viewer that shows "X of X" images (for example, Image "2 of 20"), but when you scroll, the amount of images remaining in the library increases. This appears to be an intentionally f... Mehr ansehen
Unternehmensdetails
Informationen, die aus verschiedenen externen Quellen stammen
Wikia /ˈwɪkiə/, currently being rebranded as Fandom and formerly known as Wikicities, is a wiki hosting service.
Kontaktinformationen
San Francisco, Vereinigte Staaten
- www.fandom.com
Das haben sich andere Leute angesehen
-∞/10 || use another wiki hoster instead of fandom
All the info are just used as an estimated amount since most of the info are inaccurate. Dont use their wiki as an trusted source always look for other places so you get more accurate info
They ip banned me for a month for trying to warn and add the official link to the Roblox Pressure Wiki and their reason was for spam, their filter already has the official link filtered out and ip bans ppl from editing the wiki
Their ui is also the worst ever created. They took the MediaWiki ui and filled it to the brim with ads to make as much moneys as possible. The mobile ui on landscape mode is nearly impossible to use cuz of the ads. Did it also mention the horrendous video and that follows you without u asking? And their gamestop (or whatever they have) ad appearing in every corner of the screen?
TOO MUCH ADS!!!
there are ads everywhere, and these obsene video ads cover up like 10% of my screen. the editing experience is as bad as if you had to fix a car that was in the bottom of the ocean, crushed, while people throw soda cans and tomatoes at you.
Do not edit for Villains Wiki
This review is specifically about Villains Wiki, rather than Wikia itself.
If you are planning on contributing to edit for Villains Wiki, do yourself a favor and do something else more worthwhile. The moderators on the website are extremely prone to abuse of authority, power-tripping, treating their own user-base like dog shit, and cannot take any kind of criticism whatsoever.
They way they treat their users is flat out unacceptable. Not only are they unhelpful when you need them with something, but they are condescending, rude, volatile and see their own users as numbers. If you get into a disagreement with them, they say demeaning things and insult you like a preteen would, even though these admins are clearly grown adults, but have zero emotional maturity.
If you reprimand them for their behavior, they will permanently ban you from their site for "aggressive and intimidating behavior", even if you are being neither aggressive nor intimidating, that's usually just something they make up so they can have an excuse to throw you out. Unless we're supposed to believe they are easily intimidated by people who don't put up with their inability to treat others with basic human decency? That's pretty ironic, since the moderators like to act tough when it suits them.
And don't even bother reporting an admin's shitty behavior to another admin, they will defend them and make excuses for their actions, usually with something like "they are just tired and having a rough day", even though they ban users left and right when they are also having bad days, which just shows their complete bias and lack of accountability.
And on their Villains Wiki Administrator category page, they have an image of Judge Dredd to represent them, unironically thinking it makes them look cool and badass, which just further shows their complete lack of self-awareness, since Judge Dredd (both the character and the series he is from) was created as a satire of authoritarianism and fascism, and not something to be glorified, though at the same time, it is fitting (albeit, for the wrong reasons), since the Villains Wiki Admins are prone to draconian levels of power-tripping behavior, not unlike the judges from Judge Dredd.
That's really all I can say about Villains Wiki. Not matter how shitty your job is, you're at-least getting paid, unlike Villains Wiki, where you will get even less out of working for them.
happy success about explore
Ads suck, but communities are actually tolerable
The community is nice, lot of useful information, but ads and tracking are a pain on mobile.
Fandom sucks
Fandom sucks, he likes yummie1207 and dinosakura35 and hates uwucutesingle and rebootedpoppy for no reason
Identity Fraud Hazard
The advertisements they endorse on the website are blatantly scam, and not only scam, but could lead to IDENTITY FRAUD. Never click on the website, don’t use, and straight up mass report them. Identity fraud is a serious issue and this website does not help people avoid it.
Fandom ad redirect, can't use site
It is completely acceptable to generate most of your income from ads, especially if you're providing a service such as Fandom. However, when you blatantly allow ads to forcibly redirect you from your page with no way to close the ad... then there's a huge problem. Based on my research on this issue it was of some surprise that Fandom is notorious for knowingly allowing this to happen. The redirect ad is 100% not allowing you to use their site to read wiki's. If you back button out, you are sent two pages back.. and if you click back into an article the ad immediately intrudes again. Rinse and repeat... this has been happening for a week... and any response I've met from Fandom is apathetic at best. So... not that it'll affect Fandom nor will they care but I'll never use the site again. Couldn't if I wanted to but even if they are bothered to fix this infuriating issue I still wouldn't use them anymore. They allow this to happen far too often with zero cares to give. What a shame
stick to any other service like x.
bad customer experience, submitted a ticket, formality came at me as very demanding, bad moderation if you try and open a ticket for someone getting banned they will likely say "we cant ban people sorry" and close the ticket.
It's just horrible.
The people are the problem. Most fandoms you see are nothing but impersonations, have some or a lot of false information, have a lot of mods who give people permanent bans instead of giving them a timeout, and not all things need a wiki. End of story!
Yeah, I know that not all fandoms have to be officially made by the people who made the game, anime, show, movie, etc. But seriously, every fandom I visit is just nothing but garbage.
To all the companies out there, please get every fandom a DMCA strike. I beg of you!
Terrible wiki hosting service
Power hungry, filled with ads, selling your data, only thinking about money, do not use this, many wikis have already moved to other wiki hosting services, you should too.
Worst site ever
Hi, Fandom disabled my account (Jensonbrad 13) for no reason, I didn't do anything wrong and you shouldn't use it if you don't want to get blocked globally.
I didn't do anything bad, I was following their guidelines and you shouldn't use it, Please use wikipedia for a better
This is garbage
This is garbage. Hopefully you never reproduce! I try to keep this trash from my autistic child and it keeps coming back.
Avoid at all costs
There are adds everywhere, they treat there users terribly, and It’s all around just a worse experience than competing sites like mirahes and wiki.gg. additionally they know how to work search engines so that their pages will always appear above the better designed ones in searches.
Power Hungry
Don't waste your time creating a wiki that will be removed due to "duplicated wikis" they will remove anything they please. i tried making a wiki for a fan game idea they removed it and said it was a duplicate when i literally said "Fan Game"
Fandom wants to own your content & community
Be very careful before hosting a wiki here. If the community decides to move somewhere else Fandom will not allow you to refer users to the new wiki. This means search engines will continue to refer new users to Fandom even though the content is many years out of date and these poor users have no idea that the active community is elsewhere.
*Their policy is toxic to open communities.* To read it in full search for "fandom forking policy." A simple adjustment to that policy would stop issues with bad wiki copies and allow official community moves. The only reason I can see for keeping their current policy is that they want to control and milk user created content for ad revenue.
yvensalphonse
Fandom (or Wikia)
Fandom (or Wikia, Wikicities) is THE best source with Wikipedia. I use this everyday for backrooms, etc. Well, continue the good updates!
Good luck, Fandom.
- Natolix
They never pay anything. They censor and slander any critics.
They never pay anything.
Any criticism is censored here. Critics are slandered. Real criminals are ignored for decades.
Jimmy Wales again...
So funktioniert Trustpilot
Auf Trustpilot hat jeder die Möglichkeit, Bewertungen abzugeben. Der Verfasser einer Bewertung kann diese jederzeit bearbeiten oder löschen, und die Bewertungen werden angezeigt, solange der jeweilige Nutzer-Account aktiv ist.
Unternehmen können über automatische Einladungen zur Bewertungsabgabe einladen. Diese Bewertungen werden mit dem Hinweis „verifiziert“ versehen, um darauf hinzuweisen, dass es sich um echte Erfahrungen handelt.
Erfahren Sie mehr über die verschiedenen Arten von Bewertungen.
Zum Schutz unseres Portals setzen wir auf eine Kombination aus spezialisierten Mitarbeitern und cleveren Technologien. Erfahren Sie, wie wir gefälschte Bewertungen bekämpfen.
Erfahren Sie mehr darüber, wie Bewertungen auf Trustpilot gehandhabt werden.
Hier finden Sie 8 Tipps für das Schreiben von Bewertungen.
Die Verifizierung hilft sicherzustellen, dass es sich bei den Bewertungen, die Sie auf Trustpilot lesen, um Bewertungen von echten Menschen handelt.
Anreize für das Schreiben von Bewertungen anzubieten oder selektiv zur Bewertungsabgabe einzuladen, kann den TrustScore verfälschen. Deshalb verstößt beides gegen unsere Richtlinien.







