A homogeneous, mono-energetic, 1D-planar geometry system pulsed at a supercritical condition of
The simulation is run for 20 mean free times, during which the particle population grows by
A mono-energetic, 3D shielding system featuring a dog-leg vacuum channel surrounded by a shielding material.
The problem is based on an NEA steady-state fixed-source benchmark problem suite 2.
Time dependence is introduced by turning the fixed source source into a histogram pulse.
Quantities of interest are the 4D flux distribution,
An infinite homogeneous system of 361 energy groups pulsed at a delayed supercritical condition.
The multigroup cross-section data is generated from a light-water reactor pin cell homogenization with OpenMC3 using the SHEM-361 energy group structure.
A logarithmic time-mesh tally is used to observe both the prompt and delayed neutron flux responses.
A semi-analytical reference solution for neutron flux energy-time distribution,
A pulsed infinite pin cell lattice.
The continuous-energy system is made subcritical by increasing the distance between fuel pins.
A logarithmic time-mesh tally is used to observe both the prompt and delayed neutron flux responses.
Quantities of interest are the flux energy spectrum evolution,
A 3D 4x4 multigroup light water reactor assembly turned off-critical by maneuvers of control rod assemblies.
This is the fourth test problem of Exercise 4 of the C5G7-TD benchmark suite 4. Solving the problem consists of three parts:
- Running static k-eigenvalue calculation to obtain fission neutron particles and parameters needed for initial condition generation, and
- Running the initial condition generation based on the parameters and fission neutrons obtained in the previous part.
- Running the time-dependent problem using the sampled initial source neutrons.
The first two parts are based on the methods described in 5
A nuclear reactor transient exercise exhibiting several key neutronics transient features. The transient is driven by time-dependent control rod positions and neutron source strengths.
- Phase 1: Start-up convergence of a source-driven subcritical configuration,
- Phase 2: Control rods withdrawal demonstrating the S-shape maneuver of power level,
- Phase 3: Power excursion from prompt supercriticality,
- Phase 4: Reactor shutdown emphasizing the delayed neutron effects. Stuck control rods are considered to promote spatial asymmetry in the flux distribution. Quantities of interest include evolutions of total power and axially segmented pin power, as well as thermal and fast fluxes.
The C5G7-TD model 4 going through the Four-Phase Transient.
A continuous-energy version of the C5G7-TD model 4 going through the Four-Phase Transient.
A multigroup NuScale-inspired small modular reactor model 6 going through the 4-phase transients.
A NuScale-inspired small modular reactor model 6 going through the 4-phase transients.
A depleted NuScale-inspired small modular reactor model 6 going through the 4-phase transients.
A fast neutron burst induced by strong reactivity pulses from a drop-through of a highly enriched uranium slug.
The problem attempts to simulate the Dragon machine experiment by Otto Frisch 7. At the heart of the problem is the reactivity excursion, giving nine orders of magnitude power increase in tens of milliseconds. A second reactivity pulse is introduced to emphasize the effect of the accumulating delayed neutron precursors.
Footnotes
-
B. D. Ganapol, R. S. Baker, J. A. Dahl, R. E. Alcouffe, "Homogeneous Infinite Media Time-Dependent Analytical Benchmarks." International Meeting on Mathematical Methods for Nuclear Applications, 41:25, 2001. [link] ↩
-
Keisuke Kobayashi, Naoki Sugimura, and Yasunobu Nagaya, "3D Radiation Transport Benchmark Problems and Results for Simple Geometries with Void Region." Progress in Nuclear Energy, 39:2, 119-144 (2001). [link] ↩
-
Paul K. Romano, Nicholas E. Horelik, Bryan R. Herman, Adam G. Nelson, Benoit Forget, and Kord Smith, “OpenMC: A State-of-the-Art Monte Carlo Code for Research and Development,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, 82, 90–97 (2015). [link] [repository] ↩
-
Jason Hou, Kostadin N. Ivanov, Victor F. Boyarinov, and Peter A. Formichenko, "OECD/NEA benchmark for time-dependent neutron transport calculations without spatial homogenization," Nuclear Engineering and Design, 317, 177-189 (2017). [link] ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Ilham Variansyah and Ryan G. McClarren, "An Effective Initial Particle Sampling Technique for Monte Carlo Reactor Transient Simulations," In the Proceeding of the M&C 2023, American Nuclear Society, Niagara Falls, Canada (2023). [link] ↩
-
"NuScale Codes and Methods Framework Description Report," NRC, NP-TR-0812-1682-NP (2013). [link] ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
Robert Kimpland, Travis Grove, Peter Jaegers, Richard Malenfant, and William Myers, "Critical Assemblies: Dragon Burst Assembly and Solution Assemblies," Nuclear Technology, 207, S81-S99 (2021). [link] ↩