PartitionsGraphView #104
Merged
PartitionsGraphView #104
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Matt Fishman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matt Fishman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matt Fishman <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Matt Fishman <[email protected]>
mtfishman
reviewed
Sep 24, 2025
mtfishman
reviewed
Sep 24, 2025
|
@mtfishman this is good to merge on my end |
mtfishman
reviewed
Sep 26, 2025
mtfishman
reviewed
Sep 26, 2025
Co-authored-by: Matt Fishman <[email protected]>
mtfishman
reviewed
Sep 26, 2025
…aphs.jl into mf/partitionsgraphview
PartitionsGraphView update
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a
PartitionedGraphViewwrapper for thePartitionsGraphsuch that the higher level graph is the one now exposed to the standardGraphs.jlfunctions such asvertices, edges, neighbors ...etc..A few tests are added too.
@mtfishman Let me know how much functionality you think should be ported over to this wrapper, or if we keep it minimal and on an "as needed" basis as we try to use this in
ITensorNetworksnext