fix model type reference on text

[lucaslra]

No description provided.

[prmerger-automator]

@lucaslra : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[learn-build-service-prod]

Learn Build status updates of commit 681d075:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
articles/azure-functions/dotnet-isolated-in-process-differences.md	✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the learn.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Learn support channel

[Court72]

@ggailey777

Can you review the proposed changes?

When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[Court72]

@ggailey777 - Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

[AnnaMHuff]

PR review team emailed author today

[v-ccolin]

I sent an email to the content owner on 01/12/2025.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[v-dirichards]

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[v-dirichards]

@ggailey777

Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes a terminology inconsistency in the documentation by correcting a reference to the .NET execution models for Azure Functions.

• Replaces "out-of-process models" with "isolated worker models" for consistency with established terminology

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}