Skip to content

Conversation

@sanuskaria123
Copy link
Contributor

According to the Azure/azure-storage-fuse#564 , the product group has confirmed that the chown operation is not supported for Data Lake Storage accounts. The current documentation incorrectly mentions both chown and chmod as supported, leading to confusion among users.

According to the Azure/azure-storage-fuse#564 , the product group has confirmed that the chown operation is not supported for Data Lake Storage accounts. The current documentation incorrectly mentions both chown and chmod as supported, leading to confusion among users.
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Contributor

@sanuskaria123 : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 53f7ace:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
articles/storage/blobs/blobfuse2-what-is.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@Jak-MS
Copy link
Contributor

Jak-MS commented Nov 20, 2024

@akashdubey-ms
Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Nov 20, 2024
@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@akashdubey-ms Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@v-ccolin
Copy link
Contributor

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@ttorble
Copy link
Contributor

ttorble commented Apr 7, 2025

I sent a Teams message to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@v-ccolin
Copy link
Contributor

I sent an email to the content owner today.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@ttorble
Copy link
Contributor

ttorble commented Jun 19, 2025

I assigned @tjvishnu per email from the contributor and replied to the email today.

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@tjvishnu

Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Contributor

@p15nishatr

Can you review this old PR and determine whether it needs to be closed or merged?

The merge conflict will need to be addressed before we can merge.

IMPORTANT: When the changes are ready for publication, add a #sign-off comment to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge. If the changes no longer apply, add an explanation and a #please-close comment to close the PR.

@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team
#assign: @p15nishatr

When a container is mounted with the default options, all files get 770 permissions and are accessible only by the user who does the mounting. To allow any user to access the BlobFuse2 mount, mount BlobFuse2 by using the `--allow-other` option. You also can configure this option in the YAML config file.

As stated earlier, the `chown` and `chmod` operations are supported for Data Lake Storage, but not for FNS block blobs. Running a `chmod` operation against a mounted FNS block blob container returns a success message, but the operation doesn't actually succeed.
As stated earlier, the chmod operation is supported for Data Lake Storage, whereas the chown operation is not. For FNS block blobs, neither operation is supported. While running a chmod command on a mounted FNS block blob container may return a success message, the operation does not actually take effect.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sanuskaria123 By default, chmod on FNS account will fail with "Operation not supported"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sanuskaria123 Can you respond to the requested changes or let us know if you would like us to commit them?

@p15nishatr - When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@sanuskaria123
Copy link
Contributor Author

sanuskaria123 commented Sep 10, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants