Skip to content

Conversation

@Ekopalypse
Copy link
Contributor

closes #201

@alankilborn
Copy link

5f131e1 is a real and important change and IMO shouldn't be quietly buried in a "remove TextFX from docs" PR.

BTW, thank you for working on the PythonScript plugin!

@Ekopalypse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ekopalypse commented Dec 31, 2024

... is a real and important change and IMO shouldn't be quietly buried in a "remove TextFX from docs" PR.

Do not know why this happens as the PRs are from different branches.

@chcg
Copy link
Collaborator

chcg commented Dec 31, 2024

@Ekopalypse Do you want to rebase the PR to contain just the relevant changes?

@Ekopalypse
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chcg - yes, I will do that once I figure out what needs to be done, but to be honest, I don't think I can make that change this year. (Sorry, but I had to make that joke)

@Ekopalypse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ha, guess what - chatgpt was useful , done.

@chcg chcg merged commit 914ac11 into bruderstein:master Dec 31, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@Ekopalypse Ekopalypse deleted the issue_201 branch March 21, 2025 09:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Addon documentation: introduction

3 participants