⚡️ Speed up function _coerce_progress by 10%
#7
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 10% (0.10x) speedup for
_coerce_progressinsrc/uberjob/_run.py⏱️ Runtime :
283 microseconds→257 microseconds(best of46runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization reorders conditional checks in
_coerce_progressto avoid expensive operations for common cases, achieving a 9% speedup.Key optimizations:
Early exit for fast paths: The expensive
tuple(progress)conversion is moved to the end, after checking for common cases (True, existingProgressinstances). This eliminates unnecessary tuple conversions that dominated 72% of the original runtime.Optimized check ordering:
progress is Truecheck moved up (248% faster for True cases)isinstance(progress, Progress)check added before tuple conversiontype(progress) is tuplecheck preserved for direct tuple inputsReduced exception handling: By checking fast paths first, fewer inputs reach the expensive
tuple()conversion that often fails withTypeError, reducing exception overhead.Impact on workloads:
The
run()function calls_coerce_progress()on every execution with theprogressparameter. Since this is in the main execution path of the uberjob framework, the optimization benefits all workloads. The performance gain is most significant for:progress=True(the default) - 248% fasterThe optimization particularly helps workflows that frequently initialize job execution, as the progress parameter processing is now much more efficient for common usage patterns while maintaining identical functionality.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
⏪ Replay Tests and Runtime
test_pytest_teststest_registry_py_teststest_version_py_teststest_progress_py_teststest_atoms_py__replay_test_0.py::test_uberjob__run__coerce_progress🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests and Runtime
codeflash_concolic_vvyu4fw6/tmpy_ne248j/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__coerce_progresscodeflash_concolic_vvyu4fw6/tmpy_ne248j/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__coerce_progress_2codeflash_concolic_vvyu4fw6/tmpy_ne248j/test_concolic_coverage.py::test__coerce_progress_3To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-_coerce_progress-mi5xh07zand push.