Skip to content

Remove check for hasChildren #537

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

BillWagner
Copy link
Member

The current iteration has the flag for "hasChildren" set to true, even though it has no children.

But, because that flag was set, it was filtered out of the possible values for an iteration.

This fix does mean some very old values are included in the list of "all iterations". Those don't match any of the current patterns, so I chose the smallest code change possible. This logic could be modified to remove iterations from old patterns, but that seems unnecessary at this time.

The current iteration has the flag for "hasChildren" set to true, even though it has no children.

But, because that flag was set, it was filtered out of the possible values for an iteration.

This fix does mean some very old values are included in the list of "all iterations". Those don't match any of the current patterns, so I chose the smallest code change possible. This logic could be modified to remove iterations from old patterns, but that seems unnecessary at this time.
@BillWagner BillWagner enabled auto-merge (squash) July 1, 2025 14:13
@BillWagner BillWagner merged commit 300eb28 into dotnet:main Jul 1, 2025
9 checks passed
@BillWagner BillWagner deleted the iteration-has-no-children-but-does branch July 1, 2025 14:18
@BillWagner BillWagner restored the iteration-has-no-children-but-does branch July 1, 2025 17:21
@BillWagner BillWagner deleted the iteration-has-no-children-but-does branch July 1, 2025 17:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants