Update maintenance-dependencies #7433
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #7433 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 68.98% 68.99%
=======================================
Files 1482 1482
Lines 273876 273876
Branches 28250 28250
=======================================
+ Hits 188944 188951 +7
+ Misses 77550 77541 -9
- Partials 7382 7384 +2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This was referenced Apr 2, 2025
carlossanlop
commented
Apr 4, 2025
|
@michaelgsharp looks good to merge? |
michaelgsharp
approved these changes
Apr 7, 2025
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are the latest package versions.
@michaelgsharp These dependencies are weird enough that I think we should have them separated from the rest. But please let me know if you prefer to have a single property group and have the maintenance-packages sections divided by comments instead.