Skip to content

fix(aci): Use filter_recently_fired_workflow_actions exclusively #93382

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

kcons
Copy link
Member

@kcons kcons commented Jun 11, 2025

Use WorkflowActionGroupStatus for our recency filtering rather than ActionGroupStatus.
While we're at it, remove any remaining active uses of ActionGroupStatus.

@kcons kcons requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2025 22:05
@kcons kcons requested a review from cathteng June 11, 2025 22:06
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Jun 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@cathteng cathteng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yay

@kcons
Copy link
Member Author

kcons commented Jun 11, 2025

There's an argument that we should've tracked the differences in outcome and validated that they are what we intend, but given the lack of validated traffic on the old implementation, I'm not sure that's worth waiting for vs just trying to make sure this is correct.

@kcons kcons marked this pull request as draft June 11, 2025 22:09
@kcons
Copy link
Member Author

kcons commented Jun 11, 2025

Actually, I should probably remove the various lingering uses of ActionGroup first..

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 11, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #93382      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.38%   88.07%   +4.68%     
==========================================
  Files       10322    10311      -11     
  Lines      595614   594638     -976     
  Branches    23137    22985     -152     
==========================================
+ Hits       496637   523707   +27070     
+ Misses      98484    70499   -27985     
+ Partials      493      432      -61     

@kcons kcons force-pushed the kcons/now_canon branch from 78f8990 to cdd7990 Compare June 12, 2025 16:26
@kcons kcons marked this pull request as ready for review June 12, 2025 16:26
@kcons kcons requested review from a team as code owners June 12, 2025 16:26
@kcons kcons requested a review from cathteng June 12, 2025 16:27
Copy link
Member

@cathteng cathteng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@saponifi3d saponifi3d left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

love this simplification! 🎉

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
@region_silo_model
class ActionGroupStatus(DefaultFieldsModel):
"""
DEPRECATED: Use WorkflowActionGroupStatus instead. This will be removed soon.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice! 🥇

@kcons kcons enabled auto-merge (squash) June 17, 2025 15:24
@kcons kcons merged commit 5e87f21 into master Jun 17, 2025
64 checks passed
@kcons kcons deleted the kcons/now_canon branch June 17, 2025 15:27
billyvg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
)

Use WorkflowActionGroupStatus for our recency filtering rather than
ActionGroupStatus.
While we're at it, remove any remaining active uses of
ActionGroupStatus.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh Callender <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: getsantry[bot] <66042841+getsantry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
)

Use WorkflowActionGroupStatus for our recency filtering rather than
ActionGroupStatus.
While we're at it, remove any remaining active uses of
ActionGroupStatus.

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh Callender <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: getsantry[bot] <66042841+getsantry[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants