Skip to content

ref(ui): Remove RelocationCodeBlock #93516

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

evanpurkhiser
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser requested a review from a team June 13, 2025 15:52
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Frontend Automatically applied to PRs that change frontend components label Jun 13, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #93516   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.70%   86.70%           
=======================================
  Files       10305    10305           
  Lines      594364   594364           
  Branches    23086    23086           
=======================================
  Hits       515324   515324           
  Misses      78591    78591           
  Partials      449      449           

@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser force-pushed the evanpurkhiser/ref-ui-remove-relocationcodeblock branch from 91c91bb to 1df8b5d Compare June 13, 2025 16:54
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser merged commit ff60641 into master Jun 13, 2025
45 checks passed
@evanpurkhiser evanpurkhiser deleted the evanpurkhiser/ref-ui-remove-relocationcodeblock branch June 13, 2025 18:56
billyvg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scope: Frontend Automatically applied to PRs that change frontend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants