Skip to content

fix(aci): Handle incorrect first_seen times #93860

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 18, 2025

Conversation

snigdhas
Copy link
Member

Some groups have resolution/regression activities associated with the group that take place before the group's first seen. We can skip those events and start the open periods at the first_seen time, so the first open period would be {"date_started": group.first_seen, "date_ended": first resolution activity > group.first_seen}.

@snigdhas snigdhas marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 20:58
@snigdhas snigdhas requested a review from a team as a code owner June 18, 2025 20:58
@snigdhas snigdhas requested a review from a team June 18, 2025 20:58
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components label Jun 18, 2025
@snigdhas snigdhas enabled auto-merge (squash) June 18, 2025 21:03
@snigdhas snigdhas merged commit b2fdfcd into master Jun 18, 2025
65 checks passed
@snigdhas snigdhas deleted the snigdha/fix-backfill-first-seen branch June 18, 2025 21:16
andrewshie-sentry pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
Some groups have resolution/regression activities associated with the
group that take place before the group's first seen. We can skip those
events and start the open periods at the first_seen time, so the first
open period would be `{"date_started": group.first_seen, "date_ended":
first resolution activity > group.first_seen}`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scope: Backend Automatically applied to PRs that change backend components
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants