Potential quick fix for #141106

[dwblaikie]

Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-debuginfo

Author: David Blaikie (dwblaikie)

Changes

Most DWARF tests aren't totally architecture portable anyway - so let's
just put this in x86.

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/145797.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (renamed) llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll ()

diff --git a/llvm/test/DebugInfo/dynamic-bitfield.ll b/llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll
similarity index 100%
rename from llvm/test/DebugInfo/dynamic-bitfield.ll
rename to llvm/test/DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll

[vvereschaka]

Thank you @dwblaikie ,

I have tested these changes for NVPTX builders. The dynamic-bitfield.ll test has passed successfully there.

-- Testing: 1 of 59774 tests, 1 workers --
PASS: LLVM :: DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll (1 of 1)
Slowest Tests:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
0.06s: LLVM :: DebugInfo/X86/dynamic-bitfield.ll