Adding new Rendering and Specialized accessibilityFeature Examples

[clapierre]

No description provided.

[clapierre]

@mattgarrish All your improvements have been included as well as adding two missing "annotations" and "unlocked"
let me know what you think now.
Thanks

[mattgarrish]

Weren't we just discussing deprecating this value, though? I thought the argument against it was that the annotations are generally for all readers and rarely address a specific accessibility need.

[clapierre]

Yeah, not sure if we finalized that or not. I can add a note here saying we may deprecate this. Ummm if we deprecate it I probably would then just delete it just like "bookmarks" and "captions" or do you think it should go into the "unsupported" section and I should add "bookmarks" and "captions" there and say why they are unsupported ie. depricated or replaced by open/closeCaptions. What do you think?

[mattgarrish]

No, we talked about it but I think it was left to us to take up in the schema.org vocabulary document. I just want to make sure I'm remembering that right.

@madeleinerothberg @avneeshsingh does that match your thinking on this value?

It might be good to remove the section and I'll open a pull request in the other repository to mark the property as deprecated.

[clapierre]

@mattgarrish Ok I think we are ready for the final review here before merging all the features.

[clapierre]

Hi @mattgarrish @gregoriopellegrino @GeorgeKerscher
I think this is ready to be merged which includes all accessibilityFeatures, if you can add your review.

Here is a link to the rendered view of the PR.[1]

[1] https://raw.githack.com/w3c/publ-a11y/pull/731/head/epub-a11y-meta-guide/1.0/draft/index.html

[GeorgeKerscher]

I did not go through each line of added code, but what I went through is looking good!