Skip to content

Add dbtdoc-bucket-path annotation #244

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

sqsp-rwatkins
Copy link
Contributor

@sqsp-rwatkins sqsp-rwatkins commented May 17, 2024

Why

We want to use this plugin but the path to the DBT docs in our GCS bucket does not conform to the expected path. I have a feeling that other people will encounter this limitation, especially since the expected path uses kind which is a specific Backstage term.

What

Adding an optional dbtdoc-path annotation that can be used in an entity's catalog-info file as part of the multi setup. This path will override the {kind}/{name} portion of the path.

@IIBenII
Copy link
Owner

IIBenII commented May 17, 2024

Wow that a timing, maybe it will fix this issue recently open :) #243

I will review you PR

@sqsp-rwatkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@IIBenII Great timing :)

Thank you

@moreiramarti
Copy link

Stars are aligned to have issue and PR at 30mn interval
Thank you both

Copy link
Owner

@IIBenII IIBenII left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for you work, just few changes

@sqsp-rwatkins sqsp-rwatkins force-pushed the rwatkins/add-dbtdoc-bucket-path-annotation branch from 30a9ac2 to cf30e16 Compare May 17, 2024 13:12
@sqsp-rwatkins
Copy link
Contributor Author

@IIBenII All done. Thanks for the quick review

Copy link
Owner

@IIBenII IIBenII left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks for your work I will create the new version

@IIBenII IIBenII merged commit 33361e8 into IIBenII:main May 17, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants