Description
A user has reported an issue when trying to perform drift correction over a period when no data values are included. They report that the no data values are shifted with the drift correction- even when the no data values were not selected by the lasso or the filter. The expected behavior is that the no data values should not shift in value (i.e., they should remain -9999), however, the drift correction must account for the spacing of those data values in making the adjustment of all past points.
@PhilSuiter will you please test this issue? When you perform a drift correction that includes sections of -9999 values, what happens to the -9999 values? Try two cases: 1. those values are selected with the rest of the data and 2. those values are not selected for performing the drift correction.