Skip to content

Conversation

@cedricvincentcuaz
Copy link
Collaborator

@cedricvincentcuaz cedricvincentcuaz commented Jul 16, 2024

Types of changes

  • add srFGW barycenters semirelaxed_fgw_barycenters with similar API than fgw_barycenters
  • add generic function for update of barycenter structure and features in gromov/_utils: update_barycenter_structure and update_barycenter_feature which extend/relax several aspects of existing functions for gw barycenters (update_square_loss, update_kl_loss and update_feature_matrix --> removed), seeking for potential use in other variants than gw, e.g now used with sr(F)GW but could be also used with P(F)GW and U(F)GW.

Motivation and context / Related issue

How has this been tested (if it applies)

PR checklist

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made (check build artifacts).
  • All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.
  • I have added the PR and Issue fix to the RELEASES.md file.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.71%. Comparing base (d0849a4) to head (e5afab2).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #659      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.67%   96.71%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          85       86       +1     
  Lines       16956    17148     +192     
==========================================
+ Hits        16392    16584     +192     
  Misses        564      564              

@cedricvincentcuaz cedricvincentcuaz changed the title [WIP] sr(F)GW barycenters [MRG] srFGW barycenters Jul 18, 2024
@cedricvincentcuaz cedricvincentcuaz merged commit 47c5925 into PythonOT:master Jul 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants