Skip to content

1.x: add package-info.java to the public packages #4062

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 22, 2016

Conversation

akarnokd
Copy link
Member

This PR adds the missing package-info.java files to the public packages.

(http://reactivex.io/RxJava/javadoc/ looks awkward with all those empty descriptions).

@akarnokd akarnokd added this to the 1.2 milestone Jun 22, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jun 22, 2016

Current coverage is 80.52%

Merging #4062 into 1.x will decrease coverage by 0.02%

@@                1.x      #4062   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           254        254          
  Lines         16499      16538    +39   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       2497       2510    +13   
==========================================
+ Hits          13290      13318    +28   
- Misses         2325       2333     +8   
- Partials        884        887     +3   

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 161dbef...13bbc5c

*/

/**
* Method annotations for indicating experimental and beta operators.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They're not only "Method" annotations

@artem-zinnatullin
Copy link
Contributor

👍

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member Author

Updated.

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member Author

Merging. Let me know if the text needs some other fixes.

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit d477f9c into ReactiveX:1.x Jun 22, 2016
@akarnokd akarnokd deleted the PackageInfos branch June 22, 2016 13:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants