Skip to content

1.x: change test heap size to avoid 137 #4180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

akarnokd
Copy link
Member

@akarnokd akarnokd commented Jul 8, 2016

It appears that since we added jacoco to the build, it fails sometimes with error 137 which is the code for the system killing the JVM for running out of memory. It is likely the coverage data plus some test's excessive memory use (I don't know which ones) try to go above the current 2GB limit.

This is an experiment.

@akarnokd akarnokd changed the title 1.x: increase test heap to 3GB 1.x: change test heap size to avoid 137 Jul 8, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Jul 8, 2016

Current coverage is 83.17%

Merging #4180 into 1.x will increase coverage by 0.05%

@@                1.x      #4180   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           261        261          
  Lines         16918      16918          
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       2555       2555          
==========================================
+ Hits          14062      14071     +9   
+ Misses         1982       1969    -13   
- Partials        874        878     +4   

Powered by Codecov. Last updated by 97c4e53...9129b99

@akarnokd
Copy link
Member Author

akarnokd commented Jul 8, 2016

I will rerun this in 8 hours to see how it behaves then (different travis load).

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit 1354c34 into ReactiveX:1.x Jul 9, 2016
@akarnokd akarnokd deleted the Test3GiB branch July 9, 2016 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants