Skip to content

Conversation

@killerwife
Copy link
Collaborator

@funjoker related to your recent pushes. Breaks builds which are > 52038 on wotlk classic or vanilla

@funjoker
Copy link
Member

funjoker commented Dec 3, 2023

why does it break wotlk classic?
and why does it break vanilla?

Vanilla does not fallback to wotlk_classic, does it?

@funjoker
Copy link
Member

funjoker commented Dec 3, 2023

i totally hate the fallback mechanics nowadays ._.

@killerwife
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The old check is based on build number. Builds fall back depending on what they were side by side developed with. Destination is kept atm on 3.4.3, but on retail branch its gone. It will likely be changed in next major wotlk classic version. You have to judge it case by case. Have yet to check if it breaks season of discovery client, but thats TBD

@funjoker
Copy link
Member

funjoker commented Dec 3, 2023

still don't get the point here.

For Wotlk_Classic:
3.4.0 -> 2.5.1 -> 9.0.1 -> 1.13.2 -> 8.0.1 -> 7.0.3 -> 6.0.2

For TBC Classic:
2.5.1 -> 9.0.1 -> 1.13.2 -> 8.0.1 -> 7.0.3 -> 6.0.2

For Vanilla Classic:
1.13.2 -> 8.0.1 -> 7.0.3 -> 6.0.2

Which changes did break the stuff in your opinion?
72cba6a this only added a 3.4.3 only handler to 3.4.0 handler, so it only affects 3.4.3

@funjoker
Copy link
Member

funjoker commented Dec 3, 2023

oh it's not about my changes.
It's about people messing around with handlers.

Imo SL and upper stuff does not belong to 8.0.1 handler.
I'd like to see versioned code inside own handlers.

this 10.2. change belongs into V10 module imo, even if it means renundant code.
Otherwise we can break A LOT of parsing for classic stuff yes.
I donno who started messing with mixing modules

@killerwife
Copy link
Collaborator Author

3.4.3 is spun on top of 10.7 afaik, 3.4.2 and 3.4.1 is 10.2, 3.4.0 is 10, the list goes on. Blizz each version synchs most opcodes to retail, the major outlier being SMSG_UPDATE_OBJECT which I always fork. Hence it makes perfect sense if you want minimal changes. If we copypaste the handler to the classic lib as well, its gonna be exact the same 99% of the time from what I have looked at.

@funjoker
Copy link
Member

funjoker commented Dec 3, 2023

ye but atm the checks will break everything for classic if placed into lower modules.
Will discuss that

@killerwife
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think the idea was to have less copypaste work since most of the time these hardly change.

@mdX7 mdX7 merged commit ea55195 into TrinityCore:master Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants