Skip to content

[VEN-3254] Enable vBNB and vFDUSD as Prime markets #569

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

web3rover
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Resolves VEN

@web3rover web3rover self-assigned this Jun 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@chechu chechu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Commands and addresses LGTM. Pending: specific parameters

Comment on lines +253 to +254
0,
0,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I wouldn't update these distribution speeds. This way, the BTCB and ETH tokens available in the PLP contract, not allocated yet, will be allocated until they are totally consumed. Then, because the PLP won't have any BTCB or ETH tokens not allocated, the effective distribution speed will be zero. wdyt?

LINK: "0xF8A0BF9cF54Bb92F17374d9e9A321E6a111a51bD",
lisUSD: "0x0782b6d8c4551B9760e74c0545a9bCD90bdc41E5",
LTC: "0x4338665CBB7B2485A8855A139b75D5e34AB0DB94",
LUNA: "0x156ab3346823B651294766e23e6Cf87254d68962",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not needed

USDe: "0x5d3a1Ff2b6BAb83b63cd9AD0787074081a52ef34",
USDT: "0x55d398326f99059fF775485246999027B3197955",
USD1: "0x8d0D000Ee44948FC98c9B98A4FA4921476f08B0d",
UST: "0x3d4350cD54aeF9f9b2C29435e0fa809957B3F30a",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not needed

});
});

testVip("VIP-508-testnet", await vip509(), {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
testVip("VIP-508-testnet", await vip509(), {
testVip("VIP-509", await vip509(), {

nitpick

expect(market.exists).to.equal(true);
});
});
});
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could also check for destination in converters.

@GitGuru7
Copy link
Contributor

GitGuru7 commented Jun 6, 2025

commands LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants