Move addFilter()
call after addHandler()
#184
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
CC:
This change avoids an issue where the
logging.getLogger().handlers
list is unconditionally subscripted with index0
, which can cause anIndexError
to be thrown if no handlers were previously defined. By moving theaddFilter()
call after theaddHandler()
call, this at least guaranteeshandlers[0]
will have been initialized first.I've gone ahead and tested this change manually against CFN and have found no issues.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.