Skip to content

Conversation

@dcousens
Copy link
Contributor

Hopefully increases readability for these calculations.

@dcousens dcousens added this to the 2.x.y milestone Sep 30, 2015
@dcousens dcousens added the bug label Oct 2, 2015
@dcousens dcousens changed the title avoid OP_INT inline calculations avoid OP_INT inline calculations, fix isMultisigOutput allowing m data Oct 2, 2015
@dcousens
Copy link
Contributor Author

dcousens commented Oct 2, 2015

After reviewing #484, I noticed this bug.
This PR now addresses that bug.

@dcousens dcousens changed the title avoid OP_INT inline calculations, fix isMultisigOutput allowing m data fix isMultisigOutput allowing m data Oct 2, 2015
dcousens added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2015
fix isMultisigOutput allowing m data
@dcousens dcousens merged commit 0eadf3d into master Oct 2, 2015
@dcousens dcousens deleted the opint branch October 2, 2015 05:34
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did this because op was annoyingly in global scope.

@weilu
Copy link
Contributor

weilu commented Oct 24, 2015

ACK

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Changes Unknown when pulling 173994c on opint into ** on master**.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants