-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 654
fix(expect): fix custom equality test case #4286
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(expect): fix custom equality test case #4286
Conversation
@eryue0220 |
Ok, I'll try for this. |
…0/deno_std into fix/expect-custom-equality-case * 'fix/expect-custom-equality-case' of github.com:eryue0220/deno_std: (63 commits) docs: link to `assertThrows()` and `assertRejects()` (denoland#4395) chore(log): sync `level` and `levelName` in BaseHandler (denoland#4393) docs: ignore bad snippet examples (denoland#4388) chore(media_types): format test names (denoland#4380) docs: clarify underscore guidance in README (denoland#4385) feat(collections): add `pick` and `omit` (denoland#4218) chore(msgpack): format test names (denoland#4381) refactor(encoding): prepare for `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` (denoland#4275) refactor(streams): prepare for `noUncheckedIndexedAccess` (denoland#4377) chore: fix .editorconfig syntax (denoland#4376) chore(semver): remove legacy `Range.ranges` object definition (denoland#4374) chore(semver): move breaking versions (denoland#4372) refactor(semver): rename `comparatorFormat()` to `formatComparator()` (denoland#4373) test(semver): add test for parse_range (denoland#4345) chore: use 'release' event for triggering jsr publish (denoland#4370) chore(http): fix spawned tests after migration script (denoland#4368) chore(crypto): move test scripts to own files (denoland#4367) 0.217.0 (denoland#4369) build: update _ to - in workspace converter script (denoland#4357) chore(media_types): move `extensions` utility (denoland#4358) ...
Sorry for the late response, I've check the api and its usage again, and I restructure the codebase. But the codebase is not just for the specific case, it's also a public api in jest, which is exported from jest/expect-utils. And other expect apis, such as |
const IS_KEYED_SENTINEL = "@@__IMMUTABLE_KEYED__@@"; | ||
const IS_SET_SENTINEL = "@@__IMMUTABLE_SET__@@"; | ||
const IS_LIST_SENTINEL = "@@__IMMUTABLE_LIST__@@"; | ||
const IS_ORDERED_SENTINEL = "@@__IMMUTABLE_ORDERED__@@"; | ||
const IS_RECORD_SYMBOL = "@@__IMMUTABLE_RECORD__@@"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checks for these sentinel keys/values don't make much sense to me because nothing seems setting these keys.
I guess we can just remove these constants and checks related to these
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For internal codebase, it is yes. But as for the apps which uses immutable.js
, they will rely on these keys/value to test it, such as the following:
import { OrderedMap } from "npm:[email protected]";
import { expect, iterableEquality } from "https://deno.land/std@$STD_VERSION/expect/mod.ts";
Deno.test("immutable test", () => {
const a = OrderedMap().set("saving", true);
const b = OrderedMap().merge({saving: true});
expect(iterableEquality(a, b)).toBe(true);
});
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does jest support such cases natively?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the iterableEquality
is exported from expect-utils
, and the test codebase is here
expect/mod.ts
Outdated
@@ -85,3 +85,4 @@ | |||
*/ | |||
export { expect } from "./expect.ts"; | |||
export { fn } from "./fn.ts"; | |||
export { iterableEquality } from "./iterable_equality.ts"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think it's good idea to expose iterableEquality from here.
iterableEquality
is exported from @jest/expect-utils
, but the README of @jest/expect-utils
seems discouraging importing things directly from it. ref. https://www.npmjs.com/package/@jest/expect-utils
I'll make iterableEquality
private API in std/expect
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree in some degree, because it doesn't indeed belong to expect
module. But if it's private, how to use in public?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suggest we shouldn't provide direct import of iterableEquality
. The purpose of std/expect
is compatiblity to jest's expect, but jest doesn't document iterableEquality
in their docs. Supporting iterableEquality
is out of scope here in my view.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for your contribution!
I'm landing this PR at this point. Let's discuss in another issue if you have further questions about the scope of |
This pr is to support iterable object test check and fix expect custom equality test case.
Background: #4255 (comment)