Added a test for Contract\Routing\Adapter::getIterableRoutes() #895
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jasonlewis
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 18, 2016
Added a test for Contract\Routing\Adapter::getIterableRoutes()
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I've been tinkering with Lumen 5.2 and found that
getIterableRoutes()on the Lumen adapter does not return the expected result in that version of Lumen. This is due to FastRoute being bumped from 0.4.0 in 5.1 to 0.7.0 in 5.2 where the route and the http verb was flipped when adding static routes.I found no tests for this so I added one as a reminder when 5.2 gets supported.