Skip to content

Conversation

@enfipy
Copy link
Collaborator

@enfipy enfipy commented Aug 8, 2022

Objective

  • Updates Licenses to MIT or Apache-2.0.

Contributor checkoff:

@enfipy enfipy requested review from Adoka3710, Heezay and olvyko August 8, 2022 13:53
@enfipy enfipy changed the title Update licenses Relicense Crossbow under dual MIT/Apache-2.0 Aug 8, 2022
@Heezay
Copy link
Contributor

Heezay commented Aug 8, 2022

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@beling
Copy link
Contributor

beling commented Aug 8, 2022

Great idea! Of course, I agree.

@enfipy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

enfipy commented Aug 8, 2022

@beling Thank you!

Can you paste this message into the comments?

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@beling
Copy link
Contributor

beling commented Aug 8, 2022

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

2 similar comments
@Adoka3710
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@olvyko
Copy link
Collaborator

olvyko commented Aug 8, 2022

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@enfipy
Copy link
Collaborator Author

enfipy commented Aug 8, 2022

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

1 similar comment
@rodrigocam
Copy link
Contributor

I license past and future contributions under the dual MIT/Apache-2.0 license, allowing licensees to choose either at their option.

@enfipy enfipy merged commit 8d12bc9 into main Aug 8, 2022
@enfipy enfipy deleted the update-licenses branch August 8, 2022 16:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants