-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Make LOOKUP JOIN docs examples fully tested #126622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make LOOKUP JOIN docs examples fully tested #126622
Conversation
Pinging @elastic/es-docs (Team:Docs) |
Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Docs component LGTM :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is super neat. Thanks a lot @craigtaverner !
💚 Backport successful
|
The current LOOKUP JOIN docs include examples that are not tested by the ES|QL tests, unlike most other examples in the documentation. This PR fixes that, changing two examples to use existing tests, and adding a new csv-spec file for the remaining four examples. These four are not required to show results, so the tests have empty data and do not require any results. This means we are testing only the syntax (parsing and semantic analysis), which is sufficient for the docs.
The current LOOKUP JOIN docs include examples that are not tested by the ES|QL tests, unlike most other examples in the documentation. This PR fixes that, changing two examples to use existing tests, and adding a new csv-spec file for the remaining four examples. These four are not required to show results, so the tests have empty data and do not require any results. This means we are testing only the syntax (parsing and semantic analysis), which is sufficient for the docs.
The current LOOKUP JOIN docs include examples that are not tested by the ES|QL tests, unlike most other examples in the documentation. This PR fixes that, changing two examples to use existing tests, and adding a new csv-spec file for the remaining four examples. These four are not required to show results, so the tests have empty data and do not require any results. This means we are testing only the syntax (parsing and semantic analysis), which is sufficient for the docs.