Skip to content

[Backport][8.18] ESQL: Known issue enrich missing field (#126701) #126764

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 14, 2025

Conversation

leemthompo
Copy link
Contributor

Backport

This will backport the following commits from 8.x to 8.17:

#126701

Questions ?

Please refer to the Backport tool documentation

alex-spies and others added 2 commits April 14, 2025 10:54
* Add known issue note to 8.17.0-8.17.4

* Add known issue to 8.16.0-8.16.6

* remove coming tags from notes that hadn't been forward ported to 8.x

* remove another coming tag

* clarify it's esql

* include pages that hadn't been forward ported

---------

Co-authored-by: Liam Thompson <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Liam Thompson <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f7a5205)
Copy link
Contributor

Documentation preview:

@leemthompo leemthompo changed the title ESQL: Known issue enrich missing field (#126701) [Backport][8.18] ESQL: Known issue enrich missing field (#126701) Apr 14, 2025
@leemthompo leemthompo self-assigned this Apr 14, 2025
@leemthompo leemthompo added backport auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) v8.18.0 labels Apr 14, 2025
@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 88b93fc into elastic:8.18 Apr 14, 2025
6 checks passed
@leemthompo leemthompo deleted the backport/8.18/pr-126701 branch April 14, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport v8.18.0 v8.18.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants