-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
Remove dependency on cluster state API in SpecificMasterNodesIT
#127213
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
nielsbauman
merged 13 commits into
elastic:main
from
nielsbauman:refactor-specific-master-nodes-it
Apr 25, 2025
+69
−197
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
186faee
Remove dependency on cluster state API in `SpecificMasterNodesIT`
nielsbauman fea0260
Fix assertion message
nielsbauman d890be8
Run API on local node
nielsbauman b9093e2
Start new node if none found
nielsbauman cdee810
Revert "Start new node if none found"
nielsbauman 9aee869
Properly fix test
nielsbauman bf8302e
Merge branch 'main' into refactor-specific-master-nodes-it
nielsbauman a51bda0
Revert changes in `AbstractLicensesIntegrationTestCase`
nielsbauman 4b1d6f5
Throw `AssertionError` when no node found in `getMasterName`
nielsbauman 8c891ce
Remove redundant cluster state API calls
nielsbauman 5c5d813
Remove redundant line
nielsbauman f47c766
Add temporary state listener
nielsbauman d52575f
Rename methods
nielsbauman File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I still worry this reads the state twice and might see no master the second time due to election jitter. We could cheat and remember the master node seen in the state on which we're awaiting (also saves the exception handling):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought about that too, but I figured "election jitter" would likely disrupt the test anyway. Tests should be designed to be deterministic/consistent, but there's only so much outside influence tests can account for (e.g. election jitter or CI blips).
I'm a little hesitant to "cheat" here. I seem to recall someone saying
#125195 (comment) 😉
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heh yeah I thought I'd said that at some point :) On reflection I think you're right, tests should not be calling this if the master isn't stable.