Skip to content

[9.0] [DOCS][9.x] Improve ESQL reference docs information architecture (#127248) #127380

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 25, 2025

Conversation

leemthompo
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 9.0:

…stic#127248)

* [DOCS][9.0]  Improve ESQL reference docs IA

- reorganized es|ql reference documentation from flat list to logical hierarchy
- created three main sections: syntax reference , special fields, advanced operations
- renamed pages with more consistent and task-oriented titles
- aligned navigation titles with page content
- improved introductory text for each section
- used parallel phrasing for similar concepts
- clarified the relationship between reference docs and conceptual docs


Co-authored-by: Alexander Spies <[email protected]>
@leemthompo leemthompo added :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >docs General docs changes auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Docs Meta label for docs team labels Apr 25, 2025
@leemthompo leemthompo merged commit e3836b5 into elastic:9.0 Apr 25, 2025
6 checks passed
@leemthompo leemthompo deleted the backport/9.0/pr-127248 branch April 25, 2025 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport >docs General docs changes Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v9.0.1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants