-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.2k
ES|QL SAMPLE aggregation function #127629
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
55fe96f
to
62de767
Compare
Pinging @elastic/ml-core (Team:ML) |
Hi @jan-elastic, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
|
||
public void add(int groupId, boolean value) { | ||
try (BreakingBytesRefBuilder builder = new BreakingBytesRefBuilder(breaker, "sample")) { | ||
ENCODER.encodeLong(new SplittableRandom().nextLong(), builder); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it more correct to put the new SplittableRandom
into the ctor so we just keep calling nextLong
on it?
Same for the BreakigBytesRefBuilder
- you could clear it before every call here.
"version" }, | ||
description = "Collects sample values for a field.", | ||
type = FunctionType.AGGREGATE, | ||
examples = @Example(file = "stats_sample", tag = "doc") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should have an example of the output in the docs. I'm not entirely sure the right way to hack that one up because it's non-deterministic. Maybe it's hand rolled.
I think we want that example because my first question when reading this is "can I get duplicates or do those count as distinct samples?" Mostly because I'm not good at statistics.
I do think it's interesting that SAMPLE(bool)
is strictly more work than VALUES(bool)
. It feels like sampling shouldn't be, but it makes some sense.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it makes sense that SAMPLE(bool)
is more work. VALUES(bool)
just keeps track of two boolean values: does true
exist and does false
exist. SAMPLE(bool)
does more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Obv, I prefer some example output too. I didn't know how to achieve that, but I'll think of something. Should've left a TODO.
No description provided.