fix(registers): improve detection of osc52 registers #1031
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The prior implementation assumed that registers
+and*used OSC52 if and only ifvim.g.clipboard.name = "OSC 52". Doing so is incorrect: a user may configure a custom clipboard provider with a different name, or set a different paste source for+or*, or even set the option to a string as shorthand, i.e.,vim.g.clipboard = 'osc52'.This implementation performs more robust checking to ensure we don't try to read from OSC52 registers by discriminating
vim.g.clipboardmore closely. It still checks forvim.g.clipboard.name == "OSC 52"for backwards compatibility and to provide a way for those who might use a custom paste handler that isn't exactly the nvim-provided one.I also shorten to placeholder message of OSC 52 registers.