Skip to content

feat: order robots according to updatedAt #572

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

AmitChauhan63390
Copy link
Contributor

@AmitChauhan63390 AmitChauhan63390 commented Apr 30, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved timestamp formatting when duplicating robot recordings for better consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Walkthrough

The change modifies the timestamp format used when duplicating a robot recording in the server route, switching from an ISO string (toISOString()) to a locale string (toLocaleString()) for the createdAt and updatedAt fields. Additionally, a newline was added at the end of the RecordingsTable.tsx file after the closing brace of the modalStyle object. No other logic, control flow, or error handling was changed.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
server/src/routes/storage.ts Changed timestamp format in duplication route to use toLocaleString() instead of toISOString() for createdAt and updatedAt fields.
src/components/robot/RecordingsTable.tsx Added newline at end of file after closing brace of modalStyle object; no logic changes.

Suggested labels

Type: Chore

Poem

🐇 A tiny hop, a gentle nudge,
Timestamps now with locale judge.
A newline placed with care and grace,
In code’s quiet, cozy space.
No fuss, no frills, just tidy cheer,
The rabbit’s work is done right here!
🌿✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e23051 and 406def4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/robot/RecordingsTable.tsx (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/components/robot/RecordingsTable.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@amhsirak amhsirak added Type: Enhancement Improvements to existing features Scope: UI/UX Issues/PRs related to UI/UX labels Apr 30, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27ea808 and 6e23051.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • server/src/routes/storage.ts (1 hunks)

@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ router.post('/recordings/:id/duplicate', requireSignIn, async (req: Authenticate
return step;
});

const currentTimestamp = new Date().toISOString();
const currentTimestamp = new Date().toLocaleString();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Timestamp format change may cause inconsistency issues.

Changing from toISOString() to toLocaleString() aligns with the frontend changes that use updatedAt for sorting recordings, but introduces potential issues:

  1. toLocaleString() output varies by server locale, which may cause inconsistent display and sorting
  2. The codebase uses mixed timestamp formats (analytics events use ISO format while UI-facing values use locale format)
  3. String-based sorting of locale-formatted dates may not yield chronologically correct results

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check timestamp format consistency across the codebase
echo "Checking timestamp format usage patterns:"
echo "==========================================="
echo "ISO format usage:"
rg "toISOString\(\)" -A 2 -B 2 --no-heading

echo "\nLocale format usage:"
rg "toLocaleString\(\)" -A 2 -B 2 --no-heading

# Check if there's any date parsing logic in the frontend RecordingsTable component
echo "\nRelated date parsing in RecordingsTable component:"
rg -t tsx "updatedAt|createdAt|parse|sort" --include="RecordingsTable.tsx" -A 3 -B 3 --no-heading

Length of output: 16814


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -e

echo "Locating RecordingsTable.tsx..."
fd --hidden --full-path --extension tsx RecordingsTable.tsx

echo -e "\nSearching for updatedAt usage in RecordingsTable.tsx..."
rg -n "updatedAt" -A3 -B3 -g "*RecordingsTable.tsx"

echo -e "\nSearching for sorting logic in RecordingsTable.tsx..."
rg -n "sort" -A3 -B3 -g "*RecordingsTable.tsx"

echo -e "\nSearching for any Date parsing or conversion in RecordingsTable.tsx..."
rg -n "new Date" -A3 -B3 -g "*RecordingsTable.tsx"

Length of output: 3148


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
set -e

echo "Inspecting usage of currentTimestamp in storage.ts..."
rg -n "currentTimestamp" -A5 -B5 server/src/routes/storage.ts

Length of output: 859


Standardize timestamp formatting to ISO for storage and display

The switch to toLocaleString() does avoid string-based sorting (we’re parsing to Date and sorting by getTime()), but it still introduces two risks:

  • Locale-dependent output on the server can vary between environments and may break parsing
  • We now mix ISO (toISOString()) and locale strings across the codebase

To avoid subtle bugs and parsing edge cases, store timestamps in ISO everywhere (including here) and format them for display only on the client. For example, in server/src/routes/storage.ts (lines 408–419):

-   const currentTimestamp = new Date().toLocaleString();
+   const currentTimestamp = new Date().toISOString();

    const newRobot = await Robot.create({
      id: uuid(),
      userId: originalRobot.userId,
      recording_meta: {
        …,
-       createdAt: currentTimestamp,
-       updatedAt: currentTimestamp,
+       createdAt: currentTimestamp, // ISO format
+       updatedAt: currentTimestamp,
      },
      …
    });

– Revert or remove other uses of toLocaleString() for persisted timestamps
– Use client-side code (e.g. RecordingsTable) to format or localize ISO dates for display

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const currentTimestamp = new Date().toLocaleString();
const currentTimestamp = new Date().toISOString();
const newRobot = await Robot.create({
id: uuid(),
userId: originalRobot.userId,
recording_meta: {
,
createdAt: currentTimestamp, // ISO format
updatedAt: currentTimestamp,
},
});

Already done in other PR
@amhsirak amhsirak changed the title Order robots according to updatedAt feat: order robots according to updatedAt Apr 30, 2025
@amhsirak amhsirak merged commit da8fda0 into getmaxun:develop May 6, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Scope: UI/UX Issues/PRs related to UI/UX Type: Enhancement Improvements to existing features
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants