Skip to content

chore(dynamic-sampling): clarify develop documentation about biases #14320

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

shellmayr
Copy link
Member

@shellmayr shellmayr commented Jul 10, 2025

While working on DS biases, I noticed a lot of quite complicated language in the documentation that makes it hard to understand the topic. This PR aims to clarify the language without removing important information.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
develop-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 11, 2025 7:18am
1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sentry-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jul 11, 2025 7:18am

@shellmayr shellmayr changed the title chore(dynamic-sampling): clarify develop documentation chore(dynamic-sampling): clarify develop documentation about biases Jul 10, 2025
@shellmayr shellmayr marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2025 14:10
@shellmayr shellmayr requested a review from a team July 10, 2025 14:10
Copy link
Contributor

@coolguyzone coolguyzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for cleaning this up!

@shellmayr shellmayr enabled auto-merge (squash) July 11, 2025 07:11
@shellmayr shellmayr merged commit 698e0db into master Jul 11, 2025
12 checks passed
@shellmayr shellmayr deleted the shellmayr/tet-863-simplify-dynamic-sampling-development-documentation branch July 11, 2025 07:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants