Skip to content

docs: fix CODEOWNERS syntax #184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

docs: fix CODEOWNERS syntax #184

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 10, 2025

Conversation

Juneezee
Copy link
Contributor

@Juneezee Juneezee commented Apr 8, 2025

Currently PRs are not being automatically requested for review because the CODEOWNERS file is missing a *.

https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/managing-your-repositorys-settings-and-features/customizing-your-repository/about-code-owners#codeowners-syntax

Currently PRs are not being automatically requested for review because the CODEOWNERS file is missing a `*`.
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 8, 2025 18:21
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS: Language not supported

Copy link
Collaborator

@juruen juruen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Thank you!

@juruen juruen merged commit 7145142 into github:main Apr 10, 2025
9 checks passed
manian0430 pushed a commit to ChrisLally/github-mcp-server that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2025
Currently PRs are not being automatically requested for review because the CODEOWNERS file is missing a `*`.

Co-authored-by: Javier Uruen Val <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants