Skip to content

fix: Avoid allocation in the stringifyValue #3292

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2024

Conversation

alexandear
Copy link
Contributor

The PR refactors implementation of the stringifyValue function.

w.Write([]byte("<nil>")) may allocate, better is to use w.WriteString("<nil>")

@gmlewis gmlewis added the NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging. label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@gmlewis gmlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you, @alexandear !
LGTM.

Awaiting second LGTM+Approval from any other contributor to this repo before merging.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.97%. Comparing base (2b8c7fa) to head (47271cf).
Report is 123 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3292      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.72%   92.97%   -4.75%     
==========================================
  Files         153      171      +18     
  Lines       13390    11715    -1675     
==========================================
- Hits        13085    10892    -2193     
- Misses        215      729     +514     
- Partials       90       94       +4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@air-hand air-hand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@gmlewis gmlewis removed the NeedsReview PR is awaiting a review before merging. label Sep 26, 2024
@gmlewis
Copy link
Collaborator

gmlewis commented Sep 26, 2024

Thank you, @air-hand !
Merging.

@gmlewis gmlewis merged commit eafd379 into google:master Sep 26, 2024
6 of 7 checks passed
@alexandear alexandear deleted the fix/avoid-alloc-stringify branch September 26, 2024 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants