Skip to content

Bump to 0.8.0.dev0 #1131

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2022
Merged

Bump to 0.8.0.dev0 #1131

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 4, 2022

Conversation

anton-l
Copy link
Member

@anton-l anton-l commented Nov 4, 2022

No description provided.

@HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev
Copy link

HuggingFaceDocBuilderDev commented Nov 4, 2022

The documentation is not available anymore as the PR was closed or merged.

step_indices = timesteps
else:
step_indices = [(schedule_timesteps == t).nonzero().item() for t in timesteps]
step_indices = [(schedule_timesteps == t).nonzero().item() for t in timesteps]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why was it there in the first place 😅 - we shouldn't have added this IMO. But well don't think people will use it incorrectly here.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I was surprised too 😅

Copy link
Contributor

@patrickvonplaten patrickvonplaten left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@anton-l anton-l merged commit 2fcae69 into main Nov 4, 2022
@anton-l anton-l deleted the bump-0-8-0 branch November 17, 2022 14:53
yoonseokjin pushed a commit to yoonseokjin/diffusers that referenced this pull request Dec 25, 2023
* Bump to 0.8.0.dev0

* deprecate int timesteps

* style
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants