-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 419
feat: adding support for excluding labels in csp and ksp for endpoint matching #1999
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
df06c68 to
a752b3b
Compare
daemon1024
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New set of tests for KSP
matchExpressions
- label In,NotIn
One more test case
where both of them exist? (Need an answer to this)
04972c8 to
b8487d3
Compare
c655a86 to
987970b
Compare
987970b to
966ab02
Compare
rksharma95
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM 👍
waiting for CI to pass.
@Prateeknandle please update the branch.
966ab02 to
c11489d
Compare
c11489d to
0401fc0
Compare
… matching Signed-off-by: Prateek <[email protected]>
0401fc0 to
8d49938
Compare
Purpose of PR?:
Support for adding condition for selecting workloads in the policies (ksp & csp) under
matchExpressions.Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::
Additional information for reviewer? :
Mention if this PR is part of any design or a continuation of previous PRs
Checklist:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>