Skip to content

[Medium] Patch shim-unsigned-x64 for CVE-2024-9143 #13946

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 3.0-dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

v-smalavathu
Copy link
Contributor

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

shim-unsigned-x64: Patch for CVE-2024-9143

Change Log
  • new file: SPECS/shim-unsigned-x64/CVE-2024-9143.patch
  • modified: SPECS/shim-unsigned-x64/shim-unsigned-x64.spec
  • modified: SPECS/shim-unsigned-aarch64/shim-unsigned-aarch64.spec
  • modified: SPECS/shim/shim.spec
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • Pipeline build id: xxxx

Signed-off-by: Sreenivasulu Malavathula <[email protected]>
@v-smalavathu v-smalavathu requested a review from a team as a code owner June 3, 2025 02:07
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging 3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 labels Jun 3, 2025
@kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

Check the #13962 and see if requested changes are applicable here as well.

@v-smalavathu
Copy link
Contributor Author

v-smalavathu commented Jun 9, 2025

@kgodara912,
I have raised this CVE might be dispute for checking in "Daily Stand-up [CVS-Updates]" group as shown below snapshot.
451922837-06f3cbda-0169-4378-bcda-a4f707d5db5d

But, I got following response from Nikhil Vetteth
451923666-c067ca85-5611-41b0-9b7f-5958d0981613
-Thanks

@v-smalavathu
Copy link
Contributor Author

v-smalavathu commented Jun 9, 2025

Check the #13962 and see if requested changes are applicable here as well.

Yes, I updated as per PR #13962 details here too.
Let me know are you expecting other than this.
-Thanks

@v-smalavathu
Copy link
Contributor Author

v-smalavathu commented Jun 10, 2025

@kgodara912,
Here, the Patch summary

  1. The affected files need to change for this CVE from Astrolab as shown below snapshot.
    image

  2. As shown from "Upstream Reference Patch", the file test/ec_internal_test.c is not part of affected file in 'Astrolab' snapshot as shown above and this file is not available in our version,

Kindly let me know if I need to add something here.
-Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3.0-dev PRs Destined for AzureLinux 3.0 Packaging security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants