Skip to content

Add static resources to EverythingServer sample #361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

mikekistler
Copy link
Contributor

This PR adds static resources to the EverythingServer sample. In the process, I modified the resource templates so they are clearly distinguished from the static resources.

Motivation and Context

This helps the EverythingServer live up to its name by supporting all the features in the MCP protocol.

How Has This Been Tested?

I tested this on my own branch with the Inspector.

Breaking Changes

No breaking changes.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Additional context

@mikekistler mikekistler requested a review from halter73 April 28, 2025 18:43
@mikekistler mikekistler requested a review from halter73 April 28, 2025 20:31
@mikekistler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for the review @halter73. I've incorporated your suggestions and requested re-review.

@mikekistler mikekistler merged commit 2eeb61f into main Apr 29, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@mikekistler mikekistler deleted the mdk/add-resources-to-everythingserver branch April 29, 2025 02:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants