Skip to content

Add official Dynatrace MCP server #1622

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 3, 2025
Merged

Conversation

krisdyna
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Server Details

New MCP server for observability, existing code not changed

Motivation and Context

Reference to Dynatrace MCP server repo

How Has This Been Tested?

Tested with Github Copilot in VSCode

Breaking Changes

none

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Protocol Documentation
  • My changes follows MCP security best practices
  • I have updated the server's README accordingly
  • I have tested this with an LLM client
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have documented all environment variables and configuration options

Additional context

@krisdyna
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evalstate Kind review request when convenient for this official support.
Thank you so much for all the hard work!

@krisdyna
Copy link
Contributor Author

krisdyna commented May 3, 2025

Hi @evalstate. Dynatrace employee here (PM for AI Observability), let us know if you need additional information.
https://github.com/dynatrace-oss/dynatrace-mcp  
https://linkedin.com/in/kmuhi

@evalstate evalstate merged commit 93a9e03 into modelcontextprotocol:main May 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants