Skip to content

Document [row_more] #3934

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025
Merged

Document [row_more] #3934

merged 1 commit into from
May 16, 2025

Conversation

goldfirere
Copy link
Collaborator

@goldfirere goldfirere commented Apr 25, 2025

I believe I now understand row_more, and this commit invites others into my recently-entered elysium.

Review: @lpw25
EDIT: See my next comment; no need for review.

@goldfirere
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Discussed with Jacques and submitted ocaml/ocaml#14023 upstream. Will update this PR with the result of that review in due course; changing this to a draft in the meantime.

@goldfirere goldfirere marked this pull request as draft May 9, 2025 18:54
Copy link
Collaborator

@lpw25 lpw25 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this only describes some of what is going on with row_more. Describing what it actually means seems hard, so I'd suggest having the comment only describe the 3 possible cases and which types would produce them, without commenting on what row_more actually is beyond that.

@goldfirere
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The version here was accepted upstream. Shall we merge here too?

@goldfirere goldfirere marked this pull request as ready for review May 14, 2025 21:45
@goldfirere goldfirere merged commit 8181ef6 into main May 16, 2025
28 checks passed
@goldfirere goldfirere deleted the rae/doc-row-more branch May 16, 2025 12:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants