Add support for nested models to yaserde #10
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Luca Della Vedova <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Luca Della Vedova <[email protected]>
|
It seems to work for SDF export in site editor 🤷♂️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New feature implementation
Implemented feature
Alternative to #9.
Achieve nested models without changing the whole underlying library.
Implementation description
Implementation inspired by luminvent/yaserde#165 (comment), basically we add a layer of indirection to make sure that nested models are sized.
Created a
Boxed<T>generic struct that we can use for items that userefas their type (which turns out are just nested items).Also added a simple roundtrip test for nested models