-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.1k
8275275: AArch64: Fix performance regression after auto-vectorization on NEON #10175
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
… on NEON For some vector opcodes, there are no corresponding AArch64 NEON instructions but supporting them benefits vector API. Some of this kind of opcodes are also used by superword for auto- vectorization and here is the list: ``` VectorCastD2I, VectorCastL2F MulVL AddReductionVI/L/F/D MulReductionVI/L/F/D AndReductionV, OrReductionV, XorReductionV ``` We did some micro-benchmark performance tests on NEON and found that some of listed opcodes hurt the performance of loops after auto-vectorization, but others don't. This patch disables those opcodes for superword, which have obvious performance regressions after auto-vectorization on NEON. Besides, one jtreg test case, where IR nodes are checked, is added in the patch to protect the code against change by mistake in the future. Here is the performance data before and after the patch on NEON. Benchmark length Mode Cnt Before After Units AddReductionVD 1024 thrpt 15 450.830 548.001 ops/ms AddReductionVF 1024 thrpt 15 514.468 548.013 ops/ms MulReductionVD 1024 thrpt 15 405.613 499.531 ops/ms MulReductionVF 1024 thrpt 15 451.292 495.061 ops/ms Note: Because superword doesn't vectorize reductions unconnected with other vector packs, the benchmark function for Add/Mul reduction is like: ``` // private double[] da, db; // private double dresult; public void AddReductionVD() { double result = 1; for (int i = startIndex; i < length; i++) { result += (da[i] + db[i]); } dresult += result; } ``` Specially, vector multiply long has been implemented but disabled for both vector API and superword. Out of the same reason, the patch re-enables MulVL on NEON for Vector API but still disables it for superword. The performance uplift on vector API is ~12.8x on my local. Benchmark length Mode Cnt Before After Units Long128Vector.MUL 1024 thrpt 10 55.015 760.593 ops/ms MulVL(superword) 1024 thrpt 10 907.788 907.805 ops/ms Note: The superword benchmark function is: ``` // private long[] in1, in2, res; public void MulVL() { for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) { res[i] = in1[i] * in2[i]; } } The Vector API benchmark case is from: https://github.com/openjdk/panama-vector/blob/vectorIntrinsics/test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/jdk/incubator/vector/operation/Long128Vector.java#L190 ``` Change-Id: Ie9133e4010f98b26f97969c02fbf992b11e7edbb
👋 Welcome back fgao! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That all makes very good sense. Thanks.
@fg1417 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 59 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. Possible candidates are the reviewers of this PR (@theRealAph, @XiaohongGong) but any other Committer may sponsor as well. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
@@ -143,7 +146,6 @@ source %{ | |||
// Check whether specific Op is supported. | |||
// Fail fast, otherwise fall through to common vector_size_supported() check. | |||
switch (opcode) { | |||
case Op_MulVL: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enabling MulVL
for vector api is great. Thanks for doing this! However, this might break several match rules like https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/aarch64_vector.ad#L2025 and the vmls
. The assertion in line-2035 might fail if this rule is matched for a long vector and runs on hardwares that do not support sve. One way to fix is adding the predicate to these rules to skip the long vector type for neon. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your kind reminder. I'll fix these related rules and add corresponding vector api regression tests in this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enabling
MulVL
for vector api is great. Thanks for doing this! However, this might break several match rules like https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/master/src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/aarch64_vector.ad#L2025 and thevmls
. The assertion in line-2035 might fail if this rule is matched for a long vector and runs on hardwares that do not support sve. One way to fix is adding the predicate to these rules to skip the long vector type for neon. Thanks!
Done. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Thanks!
The patch involves aarch64 only, so I suppose the GHA failure is not caused by this PR. |
I tested this in our CI. All tests passed. |
Thanks for your effort @TobiHartmann . |
/integrate |
/sponsor |
Going to push as commit ec2629c.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
For some vector opcodes, there are no corresponding AArch64 NEON
instructions but supporting them benefits vector API. Some of
this kind of opcodes are also used by superword for auto-
vectorization and here is the list:
We did some micro-benchmark performance tests on NEON and found
that some of listed opcodes hurt the performance of loops after
auto-vectorization, but others don't.
This patch disables those opcodes for superword, which have
obvious performance regressions after auto-vectorization on
NEON. Besides, one jtreg test case, where IR nodes are checked,
is added in the patch to protect the code against change by
mistake in the future.
Here is the performance data before and after the patch on NEON.
Benchmark length Mode Cnt Before After Units
AddReductionVD 1024 thrpt 15 450.830 548.001 ops/ms
AddReductionVF 1024 thrpt 15 514.468 548.013 ops/ms
MulReductionVD 1024 thrpt 15 405.613 499.531 ops/ms
MulReductionVF 1024 thrpt 15 451.292 495.061 ops/ms
Note:
Because superword doesn't vectorize reductions unconnected with
other vector packs, the benchmark function for Add/Mul
reduction is like:
Specially, vector multiply long has been implemented but disabled
for both vector API and superword. Out of the same reason, the
patch re-enables MulVL on NEON for Vector API but still disables
it for superword. The performance uplift on vector API is ~12.8x
on my local.
Benchmark length Mode Cnt Before After Units
Long128Vector.MUL 1024 thrpt 10 55.015 760.593 ops/ms
MulVL(superword) 1024 thrpt 10 907.788 907.805 ops/ms
Note:
The superword benchmark function is:
The Vector API benchmark case is from:
https://github.com/openjdk/panama-vector/blob/vectorIntrinsics/test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/jdk/incubator/vector/operation/Long128Vector.java#L190
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10175/head:pull/10175
$ git checkout pull/10175
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/10175
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk pull/10175/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 10175
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 10175
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/10175.diff