Skip to content

fix(tiny-split):The panel split animation is not displayed properly #3452

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2025

Conversation

discreted66
Copy link
Collaborator

@discreted66 discreted66 commented May 22, 2025

PR

修复面板分割动画卡顿显示异常

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • The commit message follows our Commit Message Guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

Issue Number: #3174

What is the new behavior?

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Other information

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Removed transition animations from certain elements in the split component, resulting in immediate style changes without animation effects.
    • Expanded dark theme styling to apply in more scenarios, improving theme consistency.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented May 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The transition effects on two selectors in the split component's theme were removed by deleting transition properties, disabling the 0.1-second animation previously applied to style changes. Additionally, the dark theme CSS selector was extended to include :host .dark alongside existing selectors, broadening the scope of dark theme styles. No changes were made to exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
packages/theme/src/split/index.less Removed transition: all 0.1s; from .split-trigger-con and .split-trigger-button selectors; deleted transition: none; from .split-trigger-con-drag, disabling transitions.
packages/theme-saas/src/split/index.less Removed entire CSS block for &-trigger-con selector that applied 100ms transition, eliminating transition styling from that element.
packages/theme/src/base/dark-theme.less Extended dark theme root selector by adding :host .dark alongside :root.dark and :host.dark selectors, broadening dark theme scope.

Poem

A hop and a skip, transitions are gone,
The split stays still as styles move on.
No more sliding, no more fade—
Just instant change, decisions made.
The dark theme grows, now wider seen,
A rabbit’s cheer for styles so keen!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf

CodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback.
Learn more here.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a5e4ae8 and 170e9a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • packages/theme-saas/src/split/index.less (0 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/base/dark-theme.less (1 hunks)
  • packages/theme/src/split/index.less (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • packages/theme-saas/src/split/index.less
  • packages/theme/src/split/index.less
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • packages/theme/src/base/dark-theme.less
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: PR E2E Test (pnpm test:e2e3)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the bug Something isn't working label May 22, 2025
Copy link

Walkthrough

该PR修复了面板分割动画显示异常的问题。通过移除CSS中的过渡效果,解决了动画卡顿的问题,确保动画流畅显示。

Changes

文件 摘要
packages/theme/src/split/index.less 移除了过渡效果,解决了动画卡顿的问题。

@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@
position: absolute;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
z-index: 10;
transition: all 0.1s;
transition: none;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing the transition property might fix the animation stutter, but it could also lead to abrupt changes in the UI. Consider testing thoroughly to ensure this change doesn't negatively impact the user experience.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

如果不需要动画是不是直接删除这一行就可以了,还有看下多端或者saas那边是怎么处理的,最好保持统一

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

已全部修改

@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
transition: all 0.1s;
transition: none;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the previous comment, removing the transition here might fix the stutter but could lead to abrupt UI changes. Ensure that this change does not degrade the user experience.

@Issues-translate-bot
Copy link

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.


Walkthrough

This PR fixed the issue of abnormal display of panel segmentation animation. By removing the transition effect in CSS, the problem of animation lag is solved to ensure smooth animation display.

Changes

File Summary
packages/theme/src/split/index.less Removed the transition effect and solved the problem of animation lag.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
packages/theme/src/split/index.less (2)

81-81: Limit the disabled transitions to only required properties and states.

Disabling all transitions on .split-trigger-con can unintentionally remove smooth effects for other interactions (e.g., hover and size changes). Consider restricting the disable to only the properties that cause the stutter (e.g., transform/position) or scoping it under a drag-specific class:

-      transition: none;
+      transition-property: transform, top, left;
+      transition-duration: 0s;

300-300: Remove redundant transition override on drag state.

Since .split-trigger-con already has transition: none, redeclaring it in the .split-trigger-con-drag block is redundant. For better maintainability, you can merge these selectors:

-  &-trigger-con-drag {
-    transition: none;
-  }
+  &-trigger-con,
+  &-trigger-con-drag {
+    transition: none;
+  }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1886a5d and 46e9b07.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/theme/src/split/index.less (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: PR E2E Test (pnpm test:e2e3)

@discreted66 discreted66 force-pushed the lk-split branch 2 times, most recently from a5e4ae8 to 170e9a5 Compare May 23, 2025 02:25
@zzcr zzcr merged commit 6145875 into opentiny:dev May 26, 2025
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants