-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 701
br: clarify PITR restrictions (#20938) #20942
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
br: clarify PITR restrictions (#20938) #20942
Conversation
@Oreoxmt This PR has conflicts, I have hold it. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @ti-chi-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
Summary of Changes
This pull request clarifies the restrictions related to Point-in-Time Recovery (PITR) in TiDB. It adds a recommendation against backing up tables that are currently being restored, as the resulting backup data might be inconsistent. Additionally, it reiterates the restriction that log backup tasks and TiCDC replication to downstream clusters should not be performed while a PITR restore is in progress. The changes apply to the master branch and versions v9.0, v8.5, v8.4, v8.3, v8.1, and v7.5.
Highlights
- PITR Restrictions: Clarifies that backing up tables during a PITR restore is not recommended due to potential data inconsistencies.
- Concurrent Operations: Reinforces the restriction against running log backup tasks or using TiCDC for replication during a PITR restore.
Changelog
- br/backup-and-restore-overview.md
- Added a recommendation against backing up tables during PITR restore.
- Reiterated the restriction on running log backup tasks or TiCDC during PITR restore.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request clarifies restrictions related to PITR, which is beneficial for users. The changes are straightforward. I have a suggestion to improve clarity.
Summary of Findings
- Clarity of PITR Restrictions: The description of backing up tables during restoration could be more specific about potential problems.
Merge Readiness
The pull request is almost ready for merging. Addressing the suggestion regarding the clarity of the restriction on backing up tables during restoration would further improve the documentation. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging.
bb48339
to
c6d6d3f
Compare
/unhold |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Oreoxmt The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #20938
First-time contributors' checklist
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
Tips for choosing the affected version(s):
By default, CHOOSE MASTER ONLY so your changes will be applied to the next TiDB major or minor releases. If your PR involves a product feature behavior change or a compatibility change, CHOOSE THE AFFECTED RELEASE BRANCH(ES) AND MASTER.
For details, see tips for choosing the affected versions.
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?